Ed Conrad
2015-04-02 13:59:03 UTC
DECEIT, DECEPTION, COLLUSION, CONSPIRACY HAVE
KEPT MANKIND IN THE DARK ABOUT OUR ANTIQUITY
MAN AS OLD AS COAL
PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULLS FOUND BETWEEN ANTHRACITE VEINS
Anthracite is dated at 280 million years geologically)
===================
DISCOVERIES DEMOLISH DARWIN'S THEORY OF EVOLUTION,
BY PROVING THAT OUR ANCESTORS WERE AS OLD AS COAL
===================
SMITHSONIAN ACCUSED OF PREVENTING THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
FROM BEING KNOWN AND SHARED
I, Ed Conrad, here and now, accuse the Smithsonian Institution
of having committed a crime against humanity.
Personally, I believe it is every bit as bad -- maybe even
worse -- than the terrible crimes that were committed by Hitler
or Stalin and ISIS today.
To wit, the Smithsonian has prevented mankind from possessing
the knowledge that our ancestry incredibly dates back to the time
of the formation of anthracite -- and every geology textbook
emphatically states that coal was formed a minimum of 280 million
years ago.
Loading Image...
============
Here are two petrified human skulls that were removed from deep
in the earth and originally were situated between anthracite veins.
HUMAN SKULL NO. 1
This is how the boulder was situated when originally discovered.
Loading Image...
This is how the object in the boulder rolled to one side and compared
to the contour of a human skull.
Loading Image...
This is a side view of the skull embedded in the boulder.
Loading Image...
American Medical Laboratories tested granules removed from the interior
of the object embedded and,in its official report, stated that it
contains dried blood.
HUMAN SKULL NO. 2
Loading Image...
Loading Image...
American Medical Laboratories tested granules removed from the interior
and, in its official report, stated that it contains dried blood
=============
PLENTY OF STATE-OF-THE-ART PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
Both skulls contain Haversian canals, the tell-tale sign of bone.
Both skulls contain dried blood, as confirmed by testing performed
by American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va. -- which Wilton
M. Krogman, author of The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine,
called "the most prestigious medical laboratory in the world."
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SKULL NO. 1
This is a 662-pound boulder that was brought to the surface from
between anthracite veins during a surface-mining operation near
Mahanoy City, Pa., in the mid-1930s. I had the good fortune to
find it -- by sheer luck -- in 1982 .
I had been searching one particular coal-mining site for
about a year after discovering many much-smaller but equally
unusual "rocks" (which later would be confirmed as petrified
bones via state-of-the-art scientific testing).
This is how the boulder was originally after it and other
overburden (non-coal) was originally dumped. I must've passed it
a hundred times but never gave a second thought that it was
anything so very, very special.
But one day, after becoming more acquainted with what human
skulls look like, I walked past the boulder and turned around,
then looked at it again from the side. Suddenly I realized that
the outline bore the distinct resemblance to a human skull.
I then sent the above photo -- the one comparing the object
embedded in the boulder to a human skull -- to the Smithsonian
for assistance in determining scientifically if it indeed IS
a human skull.
This was the response I received from Raymond Rye II, a museum
specialist in its Department of Paleobiology.
Loading Image...
GRANULES SENT TO THE SMITHSONIAN
I followed up on Rye's request and removed some granules from
the rind of the skull-like object protruding from the boulder.
The granules were not removed from the surface for fear of
contamination. Instead, I chipped into the rind (outer layer) and
removed them from the interior.
However, before mailing them, I examined them microscopically
and realized conclusively that they contained Haversian canals.
This is because, at that point in time, I had learned -- on
my own -- that Haversian canals always exist and remain visible
in bone microscopically even if it had petrified. That knowledge
had come from a book, "Science in Archaeology," which stated:
Loading Image...
It also showed what Haversian systems look like:
Loading Image...
CAPTION: Photograph of a cross-section of bone, showing Haversian
systems. Each Haversian system is seen as a nearly round area. The
light circular core of each system is the Haversian canal, through which
blood vessels pass.
=============================
RESPONSE FROM THE SMITHSONIAN
Loading Image...
EXAMINATION OF THE CELL STRUCTURE WAS IGNORED
Better Still, Smithsonian Now Engaged in a Monumental Cover-Up
I then wrote to Rye, wondering why the Smithsonian had tested
the granules for MINERAL COMPOSITION when it was supposed to examine
the CELL STRUCTURE to determine if they contained Haversian canals.
After all, Rye had stated in his letter: "We must do a microscopic
study of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
But he admitted in his letter that this was not done.
(Only a imbecile would even think the Smithsonian's experts
had NOT viewed the cell structure of the granules and HAD SEEN
the Haversian canals, thus confirming the material IS bone and
that the object embedded in the boulder IS INDEED a petrified
uman skull as old as coal.)
In any event, the Smithsonian had supplied information about
mineral composition that did not even apply.
I then wrote back to Rye and asked him why the cell structure
had NOT been examined and, in his written response, surprisingly
agreed about the necessity of having this done.
However, he offered an extremely weak, pathetic excuse as to
why the Smithsonian had not done so -- and couldn't.
Another letter from Rye at the Smithsonian:
Loading Image...
A GROUND SECTION WASN'T REALLY NECESSARY
The plain and simple fact is that the Smithsonian had requested
the granules for the specific purpose of examining the cell structure.
It frequently makes ground section in its labs and the cost would be
peanuts since it has the equipment. But, the fact is, it didn't even have
to prepare a ground section. It could've examined granules (as easily
as I did).
Rather pathetic was Rye's explanation that, because of budget
restraints, the Smithsonian could not prepare a ground section at
taxpayers' expense.
In fact, it's such a lame excuse, it's worth reading again:
"We are sorry, but research demands on our
"Reaganized" staff and budget do not allow
us the flexibility of preparing thin sections
for you at public expense."
That's when I had very serious doubts about the Smithsonian's
integrity. I knew for sure that it wanted nothing whatsoever to do
with honest investigation and was playing me -- and, much worse,
Truth -- for a fool.
I had a good idea back then -- and later would become 100 percent
certain (as you'll soon see) -- that the human-like skull embedded
in the boulder IS INDEED a human skull. However, the Smithsonian
didn't want it known, obviously because of the repercussions it
knew it would totally destroy any possibility of truth about man's
evolution via Darwin's Theory of Origin.
Since Established Science has long maintained that coal was formed
in the Carboniferous Period -- a minimum of 280 million years ago --
the Smithsonian was well aware that the evolutionists were up a creek
without a paddle
It knew a Carboniferous human skull would decimate the evolutionary
theory that man's most remote ancestors were from some lowly life
forms from 60-65 million years ago, since this discovery emphatically
proves that our ancestors -- in almost our present form -- inhabited
earth eons earlier.
And now I offer further proof that the object embedded in the boulder
is indeed a human cranium.
PHOTOS OF HAVERSIAN CANALS IN JAW-LIKE AREA
Loading Image...
This photo was taken at 400X, using top lighting and a dark field. It's important to note that, because of height differential, portions of
the photo are blurry.
Loading Image...
The Haversian canals in granules from the boulder are seen at 800x magnification
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES CONFIRMS
OBJECT IN THE BOULDER CONTAINS DRIED BLOOD
Loading Image...
TEST RESULT OF GRANULES REMOVED FROM
SKULL-LIKE OBJECT EMBEDDED IN BOULDER
OFFICIAL REPORT
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES
Chantilly, Va.
51945059/0 Received: 04/08/2000
75843 / Chantilly For Null
CALCULUS ANALYSIS BY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
The specimen consists of a few small pieces of dried blood.
None of the constituents normally found in urinary calculi
are present.
*** FINAL REPORT ***
CP 978171-CS 84751
Nathan Sherman, M.D.
Director of Laboratories
Submitted by Physicians Clinical Laboratory
Hazleton National Bank Building
101 W. Broad St.
Hazleton, Pa. 18201
(Original copies of testing reports are available to honest researchers.)
============
(NOTE: Crystallography is the study of atomic and molecular structure.
Crystallographers want to know how the atoms in a material are
arranged in order to understand the relationship between atomic
structure and properties of these materials.)
Loading Image...
MANY MORE FOSSILS FROM BETWEEN COAL VEINS
http://alt.fan.ed-conrad.narkive.com/ZyXb3x0Y/maybe-now-you-ll-believe-the-evolutionists-are-bullshit-artists
==============
IT'S TIME FOR A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION
Government Providing Funding to Fraudulent Smithsonian
http://www.spacebanter.com/showthread.php?p=1282455
=============================================
THE THREE SMITHSONIAN LETTERS
The three Smithsonian letters may be difficult to read
and, if so, they can be called up individually.
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page3_files/body_data/rr072782.gif
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page4_files/body_data/rr090982.gif
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page4_files/body_data/rr102282.gif
==============
Ed Conrad can be reached at edconrad$edconrad.com -- Ditch $ and insert @
KEPT MANKIND IN THE DARK ABOUT OUR ANTIQUITY
MAN AS OLD AS COAL
PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULLS FOUND BETWEEN ANTHRACITE VEINS
Anthracite is dated at 280 million years geologically)
===================
DISCOVERIES DEMOLISH DARWIN'S THEORY OF EVOLUTION,
BY PROVING THAT OUR ANCESTORS WERE AS OLD AS COAL
===================
SMITHSONIAN ACCUSED OF PREVENTING THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
FROM BEING KNOWN AND SHARED
I, Ed Conrad, here and now, accuse the Smithsonian Institution
of having committed a crime against humanity.
Personally, I believe it is every bit as bad -- maybe even
worse -- than the terrible crimes that were committed by Hitler
or Stalin and ISIS today.
To wit, the Smithsonian has prevented mankind from possessing
the knowledge that our ancestry incredibly dates back to the time
of the formation of anthracite -- and every geology textbook
emphatically states that coal was formed a minimum of 280 million
years ago.
Loading Image...
============
Here are two petrified human skulls that were removed from deep
in the earth and originally were situated between anthracite veins.
HUMAN SKULL NO. 1
This is how the boulder was situated when originally discovered.
Loading Image...
This is how the object in the boulder rolled to one side and compared
to the contour of a human skull.
Loading Image...
This is a side view of the skull embedded in the boulder.
Loading Image...
American Medical Laboratories tested granules removed from the interior
of the object embedded and,in its official report, stated that it
contains dried blood.
HUMAN SKULL NO. 2
Loading Image...
Loading Image...
American Medical Laboratories tested granules removed from the interior
and, in its official report, stated that it contains dried blood
=============
PLENTY OF STATE-OF-THE-ART PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
Both skulls contain Haversian canals, the tell-tale sign of bone.
Both skulls contain dried blood, as confirmed by testing performed
by American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va. -- which Wilton
M. Krogman, author of The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine,
called "the most prestigious medical laboratory in the world."
MORE INFORMATION ABOUT SKULL NO. 1
This is a 662-pound boulder that was brought to the surface from
between anthracite veins during a surface-mining operation near
Mahanoy City, Pa., in the mid-1930s. I had the good fortune to
find it -- by sheer luck -- in 1982 .
I had been searching one particular coal-mining site for
about a year after discovering many much-smaller but equally
unusual "rocks" (which later would be confirmed as petrified
bones via state-of-the-art scientific testing).
This is how the boulder was originally after it and other
overburden (non-coal) was originally dumped. I must've passed it
a hundred times but never gave a second thought that it was
anything so very, very special.
But one day, after becoming more acquainted with what human
skulls look like, I walked past the boulder and turned around,
then looked at it again from the side. Suddenly I realized that
the outline bore the distinct resemblance to a human skull.
I then sent the above photo -- the one comparing the object
embedded in the boulder to a human skull -- to the Smithsonian
for assistance in determining scientifically if it indeed IS
a human skull.
This was the response I received from Raymond Rye II, a museum
specialist in its Department of Paleobiology.
Loading Image...
GRANULES SENT TO THE SMITHSONIAN
I followed up on Rye's request and removed some granules from
the rind of the skull-like object protruding from the boulder.
The granules were not removed from the surface for fear of
contamination. Instead, I chipped into the rind (outer layer) and
removed them from the interior.
However, before mailing them, I examined them microscopically
and realized conclusively that they contained Haversian canals.
This is because, at that point in time, I had learned -- on
my own -- that Haversian canals always exist and remain visible
in bone microscopically even if it had petrified. That knowledge
had come from a book, "Science in Archaeology," which stated:
Loading Image...
It also showed what Haversian systems look like:
Loading Image...
CAPTION: Photograph of a cross-section of bone, showing Haversian
systems. Each Haversian system is seen as a nearly round area. The
light circular core of each system is the Haversian canal, through which
blood vessels pass.
=============================
RESPONSE FROM THE SMITHSONIAN
Loading Image...
EXAMINATION OF THE CELL STRUCTURE WAS IGNORED
Better Still, Smithsonian Now Engaged in a Monumental Cover-Up
I then wrote to Rye, wondering why the Smithsonian had tested
the granules for MINERAL COMPOSITION when it was supposed to examine
the CELL STRUCTURE to determine if they contained Haversian canals.
After all, Rye had stated in his letter: "We must do a microscopic
study of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
But he admitted in his letter that this was not done.
(Only a imbecile would even think the Smithsonian's experts
had NOT viewed the cell structure of the granules and HAD SEEN
the Haversian canals, thus confirming the material IS bone and
that the object embedded in the boulder IS INDEED a petrified
uman skull as old as coal.)
In any event, the Smithsonian had supplied information about
mineral composition that did not even apply.
I then wrote back to Rye and asked him why the cell structure
had NOT been examined and, in his written response, surprisingly
agreed about the necessity of having this done.
However, he offered an extremely weak, pathetic excuse as to
why the Smithsonian had not done so -- and couldn't.
Another letter from Rye at the Smithsonian:
Loading Image...
A GROUND SECTION WASN'T REALLY NECESSARY
The plain and simple fact is that the Smithsonian had requested
the granules for the specific purpose of examining the cell structure.
It frequently makes ground section in its labs and the cost would be
peanuts since it has the equipment. But, the fact is, it didn't even have
to prepare a ground section. It could've examined granules (as easily
as I did).
Rather pathetic was Rye's explanation that, because of budget
restraints, the Smithsonian could not prepare a ground section at
taxpayers' expense.
In fact, it's such a lame excuse, it's worth reading again:
"We are sorry, but research demands on our
"Reaganized" staff and budget do not allow
us the flexibility of preparing thin sections
for you at public expense."
That's when I had very serious doubts about the Smithsonian's
integrity. I knew for sure that it wanted nothing whatsoever to do
with honest investigation and was playing me -- and, much worse,
Truth -- for a fool.
I had a good idea back then -- and later would become 100 percent
certain (as you'll soon see) -- that the human-like skull embedded
in the boulder IS INDEED a human skull. However, the Smithsonian
didn't want it known, obviously because of the repercussions it
knew it would totally destroy any possibility of truth about man's
evolution via Darwin's Theory of Origin.
Since Established Science has long maintained that coal was formed
in the Carboniferous Period -- a minimum of 280 million years ago --
the Smithsonian was well aware that the evolutionists were up a creek
without a paddle
It knew a Carboniferous human skull would decimate the evolutionary
theory that man's most remote ancestors were from some lowly life
forms from 60-65 million years ago, since this discovery emphatically
proves that our ancestors -- in almost our present form -- inhabited
earth eons earlier.
And now I offer further proof that the object embedded in the boulder
is indeed a human cranium.
PHOTOS OF HAVERSIAN CANALS IN JAW-LIKE AREA
Loading Image...
This photo was taken at 400X, using top lighting and a dark field. It's important to note that, because of height differential, portions of
the photo are blurry.
Loading Image...
The Haversian canals in granules from the boulder are seen at 800x magnification
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES CONFIRMS
OBJECT IN THE BOULDER CONTAINS DRIED BLOOD
Loading Image...
TEST RESULT OF GRANULES REMOVED FROM
SKULL-LIKE OBJECT EMBEDDED IN BOULDER
OFFICIAL REPORT
AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES
Chantilly, Va.
51945059/0 Received: 04/08/2000
75843 / Chantilly For Null
CALCULUS ANALYSIS BY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
The specimen consists of a few small pieces of dried blood.
None of the constituents normally found in urinary calculi
are present.
*** FINAL REPORT ***
CP 978171-CS 84751
Nathan Sherman, M.D.
Director of Laboratories
Submitted by Physicians Clinical Laboratory
Hazleton National Bank Building
101 W. Broad St.
Hazleton, Pa. 18201
(Original copies of testing reports are available to honest researchers.)
============
(NOTE: Crystallography is the study of atomic and molecular structure.
Crystallographers want to know how the atoms in a material are
arranged in order to understand the relationship between atomic
structure and properties of these materials.)
Loading Image...
MANY MORE FOSSILS FROM BETWEEN COAL VEINS
http://alt.fan.ed-conrad.narkive.com/ZyXb3x0Y/maybe-now-you-ll-believe-the-evolutionists-are-bullshit-artists
==============
IT'S TIME FOR A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION
Government Providing Funding to Fraudulent Smithsonian
http://www.spacebanter.com/showthread.php?p=1282455
=============================================
THE THREE SMITHSONIAN LETTERS
The three Smithsonian letters may be difficult to read
and, if so, they can be called up individually.
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page3_files/body_data/rr072782.gif
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page4_files/body_data/rr090982.gif
http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/page4_files/body_data/rr102282.gif
==============
Ed Conrad can be reached at edconrad$edconrad.com -- Ditch $ and insert @